1000 iqpay much for it cuz even paid obfuscators can be reverse engineered
that wasnt the questionMake it open source, then you won't need to obfuscate it and people can improve it![]()
Better to not obfuscate at all than use a free and horrible "obfuscator", and believe there will be any difference.that wasnt the question
radon obfuscatori want to obfuscate my code but also don't want to pay much for it cuz even paid obfuscators can be reverse engineered
yeah open source paid/private hacked client is a good choice so people can speedrun cracking it who has better time at removing my protectionMake it open source, then you won't need to obfuscate it and people can improve it![]()
My point is, don't bother obfuscating with a free tool. You're just trying to give yourself the illusion that a free obfuscator will do the job done in protecting or adding some sort of protection layer while in reality it will get deobfuscated without big complications within some days after the JAR file starts running around.yeah open source paid/private hacked client is a good choice so people can speedrun cracking it who has better time at removing my protection
if the client is paid it will be cracked eventually so it doesnt really matter and if its private just dont give it to people you dont trustyeah open source paid/private hacked client is a good choice so people can speedrun cracking it who has better time at removing my protection
that only applies to skidded clients and insanely popular clientsif the client is paid it will be cracked eventually